Karl Marx, in his Communist Manifesto, summarized all people into two broad categories: the oppressed and the oppressor. For this reason, he offered his communist ideology to the world to end profit maximization and the exploitation of the poor. Since this time, those who hold to his philosophy, whether by name or ideology, have ignorantly classified capitalism as an economic policy of greed and exploitation. Capitalism, they presume, must encourage the "oppressed vs. oppressor" and "slave vs. slave master" world, because it is in capitalism that greedy men who only want profits abuse the honest individuals. In the 1980's, many capitalists began taking this as a compliment. Capitalism is about greed, they confessed, but this greed is a good thing. Without greed, they suggested, economies cannot grow and flourish.
Although certain elements of the "greed is good" philosophy are true and do help a society prosper economically, greed is not really what capitalism is all about. Sure, the "greedy" man, who desires to maximize profit, will hire the most labor, make the riskiest yet smartest investments, acquire the most capital, etc. And, from the positive side of this "greed," without this entrepreneur doing these things, he would not have the revenue to hire his workers (even if they are of cheap labor) or give the good workers raises. Nonetheless, it is the greedy men who ultimately fail in a capitalist economy.
In order to have real economic growth, investments must be made. This, of course, means investments of all kinds - not simply the rigid definition of investing in the stock market, gold, etc., although these investments are included. College students invest their time and money into college with the hopes of earning a good job after completing their higher education. Entrepreneurs invest in land, labor, and capital with the hopes that it will provide them with more revenue than costs, thus leading to profit maximization. Ideally, citizens invest a small portion (again, ideally) of their income to the government so that their rights will be better protected than if they were left to fend for themselves in anarchy. Everyday, investments of all varieties are made. There are two types of investments: efficient investments and inefficient investments.
The wise and diligent man makes efficient investments. He studies the economy, knows his abilities and inabilities, plants his seed, and follows through. The inefficient investor does not. He may make investments which are unwise, or, he may fail to make investments that he should make. Either scenario is fueled by his greed. On the one hand, he assumes that any investment he makes will be profitable simply because his name is on it. On the other hand, he is too lazy to make investments. His greed suffocates him and he then believes he can beat the economy without playing by the rules. The greedy man may be one who wants so much profit that he continually invests and is given nothing to show for it. He may avoid what he sees as hard-work in being employed by another already-existing entrepreneur and ignorantly open a business doomed to fail. Another greedy man may choose not to invest in labor and provide jobs. His greed, which tells him he can do all the tasks on his own, will soon fail him. The diligent men and women who make efficient investments provide jobs, invest in research and development, and, at the end of the day, only stay in business because they provide a good or service the world needs. These successes come from the diligent people - not those fueled only by greed.
A common mistake a lot of students of economics make is to see wealth as simply a piece of pie. Wealth and the world's recourses are limited and scarce - this is a fundamental truth to economics - but it is not as if one man's success comes at the expense of someone else. All this means is that the successful man has more efficiently dealt with the scarce recourses the world has, which in turn, raises the standard of living for everybody. The only reason the successful man is successful is because he gives a good or service at an affordable price to plenty of people. In his success, he may also give to the poor and needy through a charity or church, higher more workers to work for him, and place his money back into the market by his desire for goods and services. Therefore, capitalism can be as communal of an economic system as it is an individualist one, and it is energized not by greed, but by knowing the needs and desires of fellow men and women.
What do you think?
God bless America
August 2, 2010
Ryan Hampton
Monday, August 2, 2010
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Case Closed: Experts tell us Obama's Citezenship is no Longer a Debate
With the heated debate over Obama's citezenship weighing heavy in the media recently, political experts have come to investigate whether or not the One is a true American and our rightful President. Although we should never lose faith in the One, it is important to be fair and give insightful responses to the complaints and arguments of those who deny the Hope offered now to all Americans. So, what did the experts conclude?
"We have yet to make a complete conclusion of Obama's native home," said Nancy Gore, President of HIYLO (Honk If You Love Obama), "but we have found that irrelevent right now." That sounded a big strong of a statement. What about our Constitution, or our American values? She was questioned further and continued. "You see, Obama offers hope not to just Americans but the entire world. He is a citizen to a world, not just America. As long as he was born on this earth, then the case is closed."
However some argue the case may not be as closed as it seems. Ted Kerry, who is also on the Obama's Citezenship committe and author of "Learning to Give Full Praise to Obama in the Midst of a Recession," said "I am not sure that Obama is even of this earth." Perhaps that is why we cannot find his birth records. "Still," said Kerry, "Even if he is not of this earth, we may should just have faith in Him as the Emperor of the world."
"What about our Constitution, and the rules for office of President" someone from our panel asked Hillary Edwards. Edwards responded "The Constitution did have its place and we mustn't forget that. However Obama has come to fulfil the Constitution and we mustn't forget that either. The Old Way, the Constitution, paved the way for the One, Barack Obama Who has come to set the weak and vulnerable free."
So whether or not his birth cirtificate says "United States of America" or not, we concluded, it doesn't really matter. The case is clOsed.
"We have yet to make a complete conclusion of Obama's native home," said Nancy Gore, President of HIYLO (Honk If You Love Obama), "but we have found that irrelevent right now." That sounded a big strong of a statement. What about our Constitution, or our American values? She was questioned further and continued. "You see, Obama offers hope not to just Americans but the entire world. He is a citizen to a world, not just America. As long as he was born on this earth, then the case is closed."
However some argue the case may not be as closed as it seems. Ted Kerry, who is also on the Obama's Citezenship committe and author of "Learning to Give Full Praise to Obama in the Midst of a Recession," said "I am not sure that Obama is even of this earth." Perhaps that is why we cannot find his birth records. "Still," said Kerry, "Even if he is not of this earth, we may should just have faith in Him as the Emperor of the world."
"What about our Constitution, and the rules for office of President" someone from our panel asked Hillary Edwards. Edwards responded "The Constitution did have its place and we mustn't forget that. However Obama has come to fulfil the Constitution and we mustn't forget that either. The Old Way, the Constitution, paved the way for the One, Barack Obama Who has come to set the weak and vulnerable free."
So whether or not his birth cirtificate says "United States of America" or not, we concluded, it doesn't really matter. The case is clOsed.
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Trinity Presbyterian Church's Move to Cahaba Heights
Just in case any of you have not heard, we received our CO (Certificate of Occupancy) yesterday afternoon, and will begin meeting weekly at our new building in Cahaba Heights, a suburb of Vestavia Hills, Alabama. This has been a while forth coming, yet it has also not been overly dragged. It did take a lot of work, but it does seem the Lord is rewarding our efforts.
The first thing we should do is give God glory and thanks for this opportunity to now own our own building. We have of course, owned our own building before, at 1401 Montgomery Highway in Vestavia. Overtime, we began to slowly descend into nothing. It was as if the Lord made us start over, almost, though certainly not entirely, from scratch.
Shortly after voting in favor of continuing the congregation instead of closing doors, several new families joined. Before we realized it, God gave us the gift/curse of outgrowing our facilities. Fortunately, the Lord gave us Berney Points Baptist Church to be a good and beneficial host to us. And not only did BPBC help us, but in certain ways, we probably helped them.
Now, after renting the facilities of BPBC for some four and a half years (give or take), we have worshipped for the last time at BPBC. We now have our own building once again. This is a gift for us. Many of the members of our congregation have never been able to worship at our church while having our own facilities.
We must ask what this means for us now. Because God has given us this blessing, we must use it to bless others. We must begin learning geography as well as Christology. In size, the building may be similar to that at 1401, but the location is vastly different. We are not off a major highway in a bustling Vestavia Hills. Nor are we a church with no sign that sits right off the interstate, but detached from a real city or community. Now, we have our sign, and we are a representative of a community. We do not represent CREC churches as much now. We are not as much of a global church known for its theology. We are a community church known for its love for that community.
It is easy, though maybe not as much now as used to be, to find Baptist churches that represented a community. It is not hard to find plenty of FBC’s around as you roam from city to city through the South. While we have a fun time naming our churches after Reformers or Reformed ideas, it is often hard to find a FPC, and even when we do, it is not the face of the community. My point is that often times churches like ours are known more for theology than community, and many Baptist churches, for example, are known more for community.
I am not trying to degrade the importance of theology, and I believe there are things we bring to the Kingdom that many other denominations do not. And since hiring Pastor Lusk, community has been a major theme of our church. And most people who visit our church can see that. Even before Pastor Lusk came, we had a form of community not many other churches had. I remember one of my first impressions upon our first visit to RHPC (former name of TPC) when I was ten was that the people were nice. Now, the Lord is giving us this building and this community, so that our love flows out from within just our congregation, to the wider community. It is time people like me use our hands and fingers for things other than posting theology on the internet. Instead of focusing on growing our minds by what we take in, it is time we focus on growing our hearts by what we give out.
It is easy for Presbyterian churches, through their form of church government, to be connected with another Presbyterian church five states away, yet hard to be really connected with the community. I even see this within our congregation. I hear so much about Jim Jordan’s church and Jeffrey Myers’ church, or about the works of Peter Leithardt and Douglas Wilson. I hear about CCB or about our sponsored church St. Marks in Tennessee. I’m sure with great reason, and I’m not by any means speaking against the Presbyterian form of church government. But are we known more just within our CREC Presbyterian group, or for being a blessing to the community we are in? I’m sure the same could be asked for many other churches like ours nationwide. Are we known for critiquing the other churches of this city because they don’t share our liturgy, or are we known for working with them to accomplish the same goals we have: to do the will of God and advance His Kingdom? Will we be known more for the blessing we are to Cahaba Heights, or for the blessing we are to CREC Presbyterian theology?
Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying we need to take over the Cahaba Heights community and make a monopoly on the churches. There are other churches in the community as well, and they may doing a great job. But we need to take the community we have with each other, and share it with the wider community. Nor am I saying I think we have a lot to change if we are to do a good job at the goals listed above. I believe God has been preparing us for this, and would not give us this building if we were not ready. But I am saying we should not take this for granted, nor only look at the benefits it gives us (not paying rent, not having a time to be out, better acoustics, not having people fuss about our little children). Those are great, but we should look at this as a new and better way to spread the Kingdom, first to Cahaba Heights, and then to Birmingham, and throughout the entire earth. “Presbyterian” should become more of an adjective for the noun (and perhaps even verb?) “Church,” instead of a noun within itself. I’ve heard it was mentioned we could take out the word “Presbyterian” from our name and just be “Trinity Church.” While I don’t think this is completely necessary or helpful, I am glad we are seeming to focus more on what it means to be a church than what it means to be Presbyterian.
In all ways, we should thank God for this new building we will worship in tomorrow. We should also thank Him for giving us BPBC for a while. It has been helpful. I am also personally thankful for the men and women in the church who helped make this possible. I did very little helping compared to some people in the church. We should also expect some stress to come in the first several weeks or so, until we get fully moved in and situated. I will probably be at BPBC in the morning for the first fifteen minutes or so of service to direct any misguided members or visitors to our new building. I look forward to coming for the second half of the service at our new building tomorrow morning.
What do you think?
God bless America
God bless the Church
May 16, 2009
Ryan Hampton
The first thing we should do is give God glory and thanks for this opportunity to now own our own building. We have of course, owned our own building before, at 1401 Montgomery Highway in Vestavia. Overtime, we began to slowly descend into nothing. It was as if the Lord made us start over, almost, though certainly not entirely, from scratch.
Shortly after voting in favor of continuing the congregation instead of closing doors, several new families joined. Before we realized it, God gave us the gift/curse of outgrowing our facilities. Fortunately, the Lord gave us Berney Points Baptist Church to be a good and beneficial host to us. And not only did BPBC help us, but in certain ways, we probably helped them.
Now, after renting the facilities of BPBC for some four and a half years (give or take), we have worshipped for the last time at BPBC. We now have our own building once again. This is a gift for us. Many of the members of our congregation have never been able to worship at our church while having our own facilities.
We must ask what this means for us now. Because God has given us this blessing, we must use it to bless others. We must begin learning geography as well as Christology. In size, the building may be similar to that at 1401, but the location is vastly different. We are not off a major highway in a bustling Vestavia Hills. Nor are we a church with no sign that sits right off the interstate, but detached from a real city or community. Now, we have our sign, and we are a representative of a community. We do not represent CREC churches as much now. We are not as much of a global church known for its theology. We are a community church known for its love for that community.
It is easy, though maybe not as much now as used to be, to find Baptist churches that represented a community. It is not hard to find plenty of FBC’s around as you roam from city to city through the South. While we have a fun time naming our churches after Reformers or Reformed ideas, it is often hard to find a FPC, and even when we do, it is not the face of the community. My point is that often times churches like ours are known more for theology than community, and many Baptist churches, for example, are known more for community.
I am not trying to degrade the importance of theology, and I believe there are things we bring to the Kingdom that many other denominations do not. And since hiring Pastor Lusk, community has been a major theme of our church. And most people who visit our church can see that. Even before Pastor Lusk came, we had a form of community not many other churches had. I remember one of my first impressions upon our first visit to RHPC (former name of TPC) when I was ten was that the people were nice. Now, the Lord is giving us this building and this community, so that our love flows out from within just our congregation, to the wider community. It is time people like me use our hands and fingers for things other than posting theology on the internet. Instead of focusing on growing our minds by what we take in, it is time we focus on growing our hearts by what we give out.
It is easy for Presbyterian churches, through their form of church government, to be connected with another Presbyterian church five states away, yet hard to be really connected with the community. I even see this within our congregation. I hear so much about Jim Jordan’s church and Jeffrey Myers’ church, or about the works of Peter Leithardt and Douglas Wilson. I hear about CCB or about our sponsored church St. Marks in Tennessee. I’m sure with great reason, and I’m not by any means speaking against the Presbyterian form of church government. But are we known more just within our CREC Presbyterian group, or for being a blessing to the community we are in? I’m sure the same could be asked for many other churches like ours nationwide. Are we known for critiquing the other churches of this city because they don’t share our liturgy, or are we known for working with them to accomplish the same goals we have: to do the will of God and advance His Kingdom? Will we be known more for the blessing we are to Cahaba Heights, or for the blessing we are to CREC Presbyterian theology?
Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying we need to take over the Cahaba Heights community and make a monopoly on the churches. There are other churches in the community as well, and they may doing a great job. But we need to take the community we have with each other, and share it with the wider community. Nor am I saying I think we have a lot to change if we are to do a good job at the goals listed above. I believe God has been preparing us for this, and would not give us this building if we were not ready. But I am saying we should not take this for granted, nor only look at the benefits it gives us (not paying rent, not having a time to be out, better acoustics, not having people fuss about our little children). Those are great, but we should look at this as a new and better way to spread the Kingdom, first to Cahaba Heights, and then to Birmingham, and throughout the entire earth. “Presbyterian” should become more of an adjective for the noun (and perhaps even verb?) “Church,” instead of a noun within itself. I’ve heard it was mentioned we could take out the word “Presbyterian” from our name and just be “Trinity Church.” While I don’t think this is completely necessary or helpful, I am glad we are seeming to focus more on what it means to be a church than what it means to be Presbyterian.
In all ways, we should thank God for this new building we will worship in tomorrow. We should also thank Him for giving us BPBC for a while. It has been helpful. I am also personally thankful for the men and women in the church who helped make this possible. I did very little helping compared to some people in the church. We should also expect some stress to come in the first several weeks or so, until we get fully moved in and situated. I will probably be at BPBC in the morning for the first fifteen minutes or so of service to direct any misguided members or visitors to our new building. I look forward to coming for the second half of the service at our new building tomorrow morning.
What do you think?
God bless America
God bless the Church
May 16, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Friday, May 1, 2009
Holy War - Redemption - Maturity
Holy War – Redemption – Maturity. These are the three themes we see in the Bible, and they all go together. I want to speak about each of these.
I carefully ordered these three. Really, Holy War is the first and third of these. It is through Holy War that we are redeemed, and through Holy War that we, as God’s redeemed People, mature. God wages Holy War to save those Whom He has elected, and we His People, wage Holy War in our hearts so that Christ may work in us and bring us to maturity.
In the beginning, there was no real official Holy War. Actually, perhaps it should not be said so much that God wages Holy War, as it is Satan who wages it. Satan rebelled against God. This was the first act of war. God gave him a home called Hell, and God began to create a home for His People. But yet again, Satan waged Holy War, targeting the chief of God’s creation, man.
After Satan won this battle, God exercised just war against the enemy. This just war was not aimed at destruction, but redemption. While Satan had his own strategy, God had the better strategy: redeeming His People.
Throughout the entire Old Testament we see pictures of this. Satan would wage an attack, and God would come back and put Satan down in His place. As God put Satan down and brought His People up, He redeemed them. He did this on the ark and at the Red Sea. Finally, God redeemed His People through the cross of Christ and has promised to come again to complete that work.
War is going on. Now God calls on His People to fight in the war. This does not mean that Christians should wage national war on a country because they do not officially confess Christ as King. This means that the Christian, on an individual level, and the church on a corporate level, fights against sin. It means we are called to hate sin and pray for our sin to be damned. It means that we cut off our eye if it causes us to sin (Matt. 5:29). It means you cut off your internet chord if that causes you to sin. It means you pray against sin. It means you join with the Assembly of the Saints in worship. It means you forgive those who sinned against you, because that is the only way for your sin to be forgiven (Matt. 6:14-15).
As we wage this Holy War, Christ brings us to maturity. Although creation was created good, man was still called to maturity. Adam had the task of watching over and protecting Eve. This protection was a protection for any kind of evil that could come. Although the earth was good, it was still vulnerable, as we see in Genesis 3. Perhaps on a smaller and different level, Adam and Eve were called to win the Holy War that Satan waged in Heaven. If Adam and Eve had not fallen, they would have continued to mature into a state of invulnerability of evil, and thus, won the war. That invulnerability of sin is what God wants to bring us to through Christ, the new Adam.
How long will we mature? Perhaps for eternity. Even in Final Resurrected glory, when God’s Kingdom is no longer vulnerable, we will perhaps have places to mature. Granted, if sin is not vulnerable, we will have won the war, and we will mature in other ways. But until sin is fully defeated, we are called to fight in this Holy War so that it may bring us to maturity and final Redemption with the return of Christ. Christ is the new Adam, and so the Church must be the new Eve. Christ was a better Adam. So we must be a better Eve.
What do you think?
God bless America
God bless the Church
May 1, 2009
Ryan Hampton
I carefully ordered these three. Really, Holy War is the first and third of these. It is through Holy War that we are redeemed, and through Holy War that we, as God’s redeemed People, mature. God wages Holy War to save those Whom He has elected, and we His People, wage Holy War in our hearts so that Christ may work in us and bring us to maturity.
In the beginning, there was no real official Holy War. Actually, perhaps it should not be said so much that God wages Holy War, as it is Satan who wages it. Satan rebelled against God. This was the first act of war. God gave him a home called Hell, and God began to create a home for His People. But yet again, Satan waged Holy War, targeting the chief of God’s creation, man.
After Satan won this battle, God exercised just war against the enemy. This just war was not aimed at destruction, but redemption. While Satan had his own strategy, God had the better strategy: redeeming His People.
Throughout the entire Old Testament we see pictures of this. Satan would wage an attack, and God would come back and put Satan down in His place. As God put Satan down and brought His People up, He redeemed them. He did this on the ark and at the Red Sea. Finally, God redeemed His People through the cross of Christ and has promised to come again to complete that work.
War is going on. Now God calls on His People to fight in the war. This does not mean that Christians should wage national war on a country because they do not officially confess Christ as King. This means that the Christian, on an individual level, and the church on a corporate level, fights against sin. It means we are called to hate sin and pray for our sin to be damned. It means that we cut off our eye if it causes us to sin (Matt. 5:29). It means you cut off your internet chord if that causes you to sin. It means you pray against sin. It means you join with the Assembly of the Saints in worship. It means you forgive those who sinned against you, because that is the only way for your sin to be forgiven (Matt. 6:14-15).
As we wage this Holy War, Christ brings us to maturity. Although creation was created good, man was still called to maturity. Adam had the task of watching over and protecting Eve. This protection was a protection for any kind of evil that could come. Although the earth was good, it was still vulnerable, as we see in Genesis 3. Perhaps on a smaller and different level, Adam and Eve were called to win the Holy War that Satan waged in Heaven. If Adam and Eve had not fallen, they would have continued to mature into a state of invulnerability of evil, and thus, won the war. That invulnerability of sin is what God wants to bring us to through Christ, the new Adam.
How long will we mature? Perhaps for eternity. Even in Final Resurrected glory, when God’s Kingdom is no longer vulnerable, we will perhaps have places to mature. Granted, if sin is not vulnerable, we will have won the war, and we will mature in other ways. But until sin is fully defeated, we are called to fight in this Holy War so that it may bring us to maturity and final Redemption with the return of Christ. Christ is the new Adam, and so the Church must be the new Eve. Christ was a better Adam. So we must be a better Eve.
What do you think?
God bless America
God bless the Church
May 1, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Worship Services
Many seeker-friendly church services give us a sermon that ends something like this: “If there is anyone here who has not accepted Christ, you may do so now. Every head bowed and every eye closed, raise your hand if you want to accept Christ.” There is a place for this language and it is great if it leads someone to Christ. But I’m not for sure this is what the purpose of a sermon is.
Many people get scared off by the word liturgy because it seems to replace the heart of Christian worship with text and empty recitations. Certainly, the heart of worship should not be seen as meaningless, and certainly a passionate charismatic worshipper worships God more truly than a Reformed worshipper going through the motions of worship with no real meaning or connection. But I also believe that nearly every church has some form of liturgy, in the sense of order to worship. The question becomes how deep, meaningful, relevant, and ultimately, Biblically sound the liturgy is.
While faithfully attending my church Trinity Presbyterian Church (CREC), I have been privileged to see other church services from other churches, primarily Church of the Highlands, where I go with some friends Sunday evenings. It is nice to see the worship services of other local churches who aim to lift high the cross. I don’t expect every church to have the same structure as ours, and that is okay even though I like our order and structure, which makes it both formal and personable. Church of the Highlands is seeker friendly and has done a lot for the Kingdom and I enjoy the sermons by Chris Hodges. But it seems that a lot of these churches end with the “every head bowed every eye closed” style, and despite being aggressive and seeker friendly, I am not sure they do as much for the Kingdom as a deeper liturgical service would.
Both Trinity Presbyterian and Church of the Highlands have an order to the service. Church of the Highlands has about twenty-five minutes of contemporary Christian music, followed by a sermon that always ends in the same seeker friendly way. After this there is offering and the service is pretty much over. Our service goes much deeper in its order and probably exemplifies the Church’s life more fully. We are called into worship. We confess our sins. We have the reading of Scripture and a sermon. We give our tithes and offerings. We confess our faith. We participate in the Lord’s Supper. We are called forth into the world to live out the Great Commission. This becomes more relevant to the Christian life. It is more consistent with God’s covenants He has made with His People. Sermons lead us into applications and ultimately into further communion with Christ by eating at His table. Each layer leads and flows into the next.
We go to Church to be the Church and renew covenant with God. We win the lost by being the Church everywhere else. When a non-believer steps into Church, they should see the Church in covenant with God, not be pressured into “making a decision.” Scripture does not give us much detail on worship services. But it seems the pattern is something like this: someone is converted, they are given the teaching of the Word, and then they eat and fellowship with other believers. Sometimes, yes, they are converted by the preaching of the Word, but once they enter the church, they are given Word and Sacrament (Sacrament follows the preaching).
There is a time to preach and offer salvation to others and it is good to see churches like Church of the Highlands have the heart to do that. And certainly going to church is a place where salvation should be offered. But I don’t think the modern approach and liturgy is always the best way. While these seeker friendly churches probably do a better job than we do at really reaching out to others on a personal level (which should certainly be commended), they often fail more at really keeping faithful Christians who keep covenant with God. Beyond this, non-believers are often more drawn into a deeper and richer liturgical service because they are able to see the richer side of the Christian faith. It grows on them. They don’t feel pressured into anything.
With all of this said, I wish the Church could ultimately become a Church that is seeker friendly and offers salvation to the lost and is good at keeping faithful Christians who mature in the faith. Often churches have one and not the other. But the point of our worship service is not to strategize how we will win the lost, nor is it a place where we even necessarily directly attempt to win the lost. It is where we keep covenant with God. I do think that more Reformed and deeper liturgical services could do better at having more mission trips and really reaching the lost in ways similar to many contemporary seeker-friendly churches. I wish seeker-friendly churches would broaden and deeper their worship services into a real place of covenant renewal service for God’s People, to train and equip Christians to be faithful to their King.
What do you think?
God bless the Church
God bless America
March 27, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Many people get scared off by the word liturgy because it seems to replace the heart of Christian worship with text and empty recitations. Certainly, the heart of worship should not be seen as meaningless, and certainly a passionate charismatic worshipper worships God more truly than a Reformed worshipper going through the motions of worship with no real meaning or connection. But I also believe that nearly every church has some form of liturgy, in the sense of order to worship. The question becomes how deep, meaningful, relevant, and ultimately, Biblically sound the liturgy is.
While faithfully attending my church Trinity Presbyterian Church (CREC), I have been privileged to see other church services from other churches, primarily Church of the Highlands, where I go with some friends Sunday evenings. It is nice to see the worship services of other local churches who aim to lift high the cross. I don’t expect every church to have the same structure as ours, and that is okay even though I like our order and structure, which makes it both formal and personable. Church of the Highlands is seeker friendly and has done a lot for the Kingdom and I enjoy the sermons by Chris Hodges. But it seems that a lot of these churches end with the “every head bowed every eye closed” style, and despite being aggressive and seeker friendly, I am not sure they do as much for the Kingdom as a deeper liturgical service would.
Both Trinity Presbyterian and Church of the Highlands have an order to the service. Church of the Highlands has about twenty-five minutes of contemporary Christian music, followed by a sermon that always ends in the same seeker friendly way. After this there is offering and the service is pretty much over. Our service goes much deeper in its order and probably exemplifies the Church’s life more fully. We are called into worship. We confess our sins. We have the reading of Scripture and a sermon. We give our tithes and offerings. We confess our faith. We participate in the Lord’s Supper. We are called forth into the world to live out the Great Commission. This becomes more relevant to the Christian life. It is more consistent with God’s covenants He has made with His People. Sermons lead us into applications and ultimately into further communion with Christ by eating at His table. Each layer leads and flows into the next.
We go to Church to be the Church and renew covenant with God. We win the lost by being the Church everywhere else. When a non-believer steps into Church, they should see the Church in covenant with God, not be pressured into “making a decision.” Scripture does not give us much detail on worship services. But it seems the pattern is something like this: someone is converted, they are given the teaching of the Word, and then they eat and fellowship with other believers. Sometimes, yes, they are converted by the preaching of the Word, but once they enter the church, they are given Word and Sacrament (Sacrament follows the preaching).
There is a time to preach and offer salvation to others and it is good to see churches like Church of the Highlands have the heart to do that. And certainly going to church is a place where salvation should be offered. But I don’t think the modern approach and liturgy is always the best way. While these seeker friendly churches probably do a better job than we do at really reaching out to others on a personal level (which should certainly be commended), they often fail more at really keeping faithful Christians who keep covenant with God. Beyond this, non-believers are often more drawn into a deeper and richer liturgical service because they are able to see the richer side of the Christian faith. It grows on them. They don’t feel pressured into anything.
With all of this said, I wish the Church could ultimately become a Church that is seeker friendly and offers salvation to the lost and is good at keeping faithful Christians who mature in the faith. Often churches have one and not the other. But the point of our worship service is not to strategize how we will win the lost, nor is it a place where we even necessarily directly attempt to win the lost. It is where we keep covenant with God. I do think that more Reformed and deeper liturgical services could do better at having more mission trips and really reaching the lost in ways similar to many contemporary seeker-friendly churches. I wish seeker-friendly churches would broaden and deeper their worship services into a real place of covenant renewal service for God’s People, to train and equip Christians to be faithful to their King.
What do you think?
God bless the Church
God bless America
March 27, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Monday, March 2, 2009
Why You Should Go to Church
I want to ask the simple question of why one should go to church. Can't you just be a good Christian without going to church every week? Isn't that legalistic? This could be asked from multiple vantage points or points of departure, so this look is just one of those. However I do believe all of the different points of departure I have used are related and build off each other. It doesn’t make this any less valid.
I will look at it from the perspective of the Church corporate being the Bride of Christ. Or perhaps you could say, we are currently engaged to Christ, awaiting the actual marriage that will happen in the last day as we enter into Final Resurrection glory. Each one of us are sons of God individually, but a part of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – the Bride of Christ.
Usually when people are planning on getting married, they go on dates. If they didn’t ever see each other, their relationship would be thin, and marriage may not be the best of ideas. In the same way, we who are to be married to Christ, should not cut off communion with each other and Christ. We must have our “dates” with Christ, which takes place each Lord’s Day in church.
Christ does it the traditional way. He picks us up. Now true, it seems like we are the one’s driving to His House. But it is He Who calls us into His presence, takes charge, and brings us into the throne room of Heaven upon our confession of sin and His declared forgiveness. He comes near to us, to draw us into His presence. He invites us to His house for dinner at His table in communion. We do things for Christ such as give our praises, but it is primarily Him who takes charge and works in us, bringing out the best in His Bride elect. If you reject these things Christ does for you on a corporate level, how can you expect to have a real personal relationship with Him, or take parts in the fruits of His Kingdom after this life?
If you are out of the Church, don’t get down on yourself. Look at it as going on a date with your Groom – the Groom Who loves you enough to lay down His own life for you in the cruelest of ways. Come into Church not hoping for an emotional experience, but expecting God’s work to give you strength in all you do. One day we will live with Christ in His presence. For now we must accept and love the community He has given us now, and await the Final Resurrection glory we are promised to obtain in the Last Day through Jesus Christ.
What do you think?
God bless His Church
God bless you
March 1, 2009
Ryan Hampton
I will look at it from the perspective of the Church corporate being the Bride of Christ. Or perhaps you could say, we are currently engaged to Christ, awaiting the actual marriage that will happen in the last day as we enter into Final Resurrection glory. Each one of us are sons of God individually, but a part of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – the Bride of Christ.
Usually when people are planning on getting married, they go on dates. If they didn’t ever see each other, their relationship would be thin, and marriage may not be the best of ideas. In the same way, we who are to be married to Christ, should not cut off communion with each other and Christ. We must have our “dates” with Christ, which takes place each Lord’s Day in church.
Christ does it the traditional way. He picks us up. Now true, it seems like we are the one’s driving to His House. But it is He Who calls us into His presence, takes charge, and brings us into the throne room of Heaven upon our confession of sin and His declared forgiveness. He comes near to us, to draw us into His presence. He invites us to His house for dinner at His table in communion. We do things for Christ such as give our praises, but it is primarily Him who takes charge and works in us, bringing out the best in His Bride elect. If you reject these things Christ does for you on a corporate level, how can you expect to have a real personal relationship with Him, or take parts in the fruits of His Kingdom after this life?
If you are out of the Church, don’t get down on yourself. Look at it as going on a date with your Groom – the Groom Who loves you enough to lay down His own life for you in the cruelest of ways. Come into Church not hoping for an emotional experience, but expecting God’s work to give you strength in all you do. One day we will live with Christ in His presence. For now we must accept and love the community He has given us now, and await the Final Resurrection glory we are promised to obtain in the Last Day through Jesus Christ.
What do you think?
God bless His Church
God bless you
March 1, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Friday, February 6, 2009
The Great Paradox
With the recent election of Barack Obama, conservative Christians mostly responded with a two-fold voice. This two-fold voice was not something that separated the conservative Christians in two groups; rather, it was a voice that ran down the middle of most conservative Christian individually.
This two-fold voice that spoke loud after it was announced that Obama was our Commander-in-Chief elect. The voice was something like this: “How could America elect such a man to the nation’s highest office” and “We must trust God because it was He Who put this man in office, and He did so with a reason.”
Both replies, I believe, have truth in them. The second is definitely true, and I believe for various reasons not pertaining to this blog that the first is a valid question. But the two may seem contradicting: if God was the One Who put this man in office, then how can we blame the American mob for electing him? Was it not in God’s plan that He would lean the hearts of the majority of Americans to Barack Obama?
Christians who were against Obama believe both that this was an American mistake and a Sovereign plan, because they essentially recognize this as a paradox. The Bible is full of paradoxes. How is Jesus both God and man? How is Jesus both God and the Son of God? How are there three persons in one God? How is God all-knowing, yet Scripture shows us certain emotions God feels at a certain time as if He did not see what was coming (the best example is perhaps God feeling sorry for creating the man in Gen. 6:6)? How is Mary both virgin and mother (no, not step Mother, but the one who gave birth to Christ)? The list could go on, but these are just obvious examples from Scripture. We must realize that these questions are answered in the supernatural world, not the world that our sinful ignorant hearts and minds can fathom.
Therefore, Christians against Obama find no problem in accepting this paradox of the election of the “wrong yet right” man. But this again is only the most recent obvious example. The attacks of September 11, 2001 could be a similar example. We trust that God is in control, yet we grieve with the evil that has taken place, and we feel anger toward those who caused the evil. Perhaps orthodox Christians do not understand this relationship, but they nevertheless accept both God’s Will and the responsibility of man.
But for some strange reason, we argue about this where it matters the most: our salvation. We cannot accept this as a paradox. For some Christians, the word “predestined” that Paul uses simply means “God always knew,” and some Christians on the other end ignore or twist the parts of Scripture that tell us Christ died for all, or we should preach God’s Word to all, etc. Why can we not simply accept God’s absolute Sovereignty in our salvation, while also keeping the existence of human free will? The two do not have to be in disconnect. The Bible teaches both, so both should be taught and accepted.
There may be some disagreements in emphasis, but that should be it. This should not be something that splits a church or calls one’s salvation into question (unless they are completely one-sided beyond any real orthodox teaching). Christ’s death was completely in the Sovereignty of God, yet those who put the nails into his body are not held guiltless. Sure we don’t understand. That’s fine. God does. In the same way, we should not hold the ones who reject Christ guiltless just because we see their rejection as predestined. Both human responsibility and the Sovereignty of God exist. Sure, I can’t explain it. But I cannot fully fathom (or even almost fathom) the Trinity, yet I believe it.
We can deepen our minds and try to fathom these paradoxes. Some people call that a waste of time, but I honestly don’t mind. Perhaps God in knowing what decisions mankind would make when left to their own will, places certain decisions in front of them, knowing their results, to carry out His plan. Perhaps God put a predestined plan in motion at the beginning, knowing what would happen through human choice, and then engages in the world with emotion by hiding certain things from Him at the beginning as well (where God has a free will and a sense of vulnerability that was predestined by God before the world began). I am not saying either of those views are correct completely or even to any degree at all. We don’t know, we can only exercise our minds in the paradox. But nonetheless, we must accept both God’s Sovereign plan and our responsibilities in every facet of life, even our own salvation.
What do you think?
God bless America
Pray for our Troops
God bless His Church
February 6, 2009
Ryan Hampton
This two-fold voice that spoke loud after it was announced that Obama was our Commander-in-Chief elect. The voice was something like this: “How could America elect such a man to the nation’s highest office” and “We must trust God because it was He Who put this man in office, and He did so with a reason.”
Both replies, I believe, have truth in them. The second is definitely true, and I believe for various reasons not pertaining to this blog that the first is a valid question. But the two may seem contradicting: if God was the One Who put this man in office, then how can we blame the American mob for electing him? Was it not in God’s plan that He would lean the hearts of the majority of Americans to Barack Obama?
Christians who were against Obama believe both that this was an American mistake and a Sovereign plan, because they essentially recognize this as a paradox. The Bible is full of paradoxes. How is Jesus both God and man? How is Jesus both God and the Son of God? How are there three persons in one God? How is God all-knowing, yet Scripture shows us certain emotions God feels at a certain time as if He did not see what was coming (the best example is perhaps God feeling sorry for creating the man in Gen. 6:6)? How is Mary both virgin and mother (no, not step Mother, but the one who gave birth to Christ)? The list could go on, but these are just obvious examples from Scripture. We must realize that these questions are answered in the supernatural world, not the world that our sinful ignorant hearts and minds can fathom.
Therefore, Christians against Obama find no problem in accepting this paradox of the election of the “wrong yet right” man. But this again is only the most recent obvious example. The attacks of September 11, 2001 could be a similar example. We trust that God is in control, yet we grieve with the evil that has taken place, and we feel anger toward those who caused the evil. Perhaps orthodox Christians do not understand this relationship, but they nevertheless accept both God’s Will and the responsibility of man.
But for some strange reason, we argue about this where it matters the most: our salvation. We cannot accept this as a paradox. For some Christians, the word “predestined” that Paul uses simply means “God always knew,” and some Christians on the other end ignore or twist the parts of Scripture that tell us Christ died for all, or we should preach God’s Word to all, etc. Why can we not simply accept God’s absolute Sovereignty in our salvation, while also keeping the existence of human free will? The two do not have to be in disconnect. The Bible teaches both, so both should be taught and accepted.
There may be some disagreements in emphasis, but that should be it. This should not be something that splits a church or calls one’s salvation into question (unless they are completely one-sided beyond any real orthodox teaching). Christ’s death was completely in the Sovereignty of God, yet those who put the nails into his body are not held guiltless. Sure we don’t understand. That’s fine. God does. In the same way, we should not hold the ones who reject Christ guiltless just because we see their rejection as predestined. Both human responsibility and the Sovereignty of God exist. Sure, I can’t explain it. But I cannot fully fathom (or even almost fathom) the Trinity, yet I believe it.
We can deepen our minds and try to fathom these paradoxes. Some people call that a waste of time, but I honestly don’t mind. Perhaps God in knowing what decisions mankind would make when left to their own will, places certain decisions in front of them, knowing their results, to carry out His plan. Perhaps God put a predestined plan in motion at the beginning, knowing what would happen through human choice, and then engages in the world with emotion by hiding certain things from Him at the beginning as well (where God has a free will and a sense of vulnerability that was predestined by God before the world began). I am not saying either of those views are correct completely or even to any degree at all. We don’t know, we can only exercise our minds in the paradox. But nonetheless, we must accept both God’s Sovereign plan and our responsibilities in every facet of life, even our own salvation.
What do you think?
God bless America
Pray for our Troops
God bless His Church
February 6, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Tough Economy May Be Good For The Church
Many people are worrying frantic over this tough economy in our nation today. Jobs are becoming less and less available, the value of the dollar is dropping worldwide, while we hold every penny in our pockets with precious value. The recent inauguration of Barack Obama has lead many to believe the economy is back on the rise, while leaving many others including myself worried that this is only the beginning.
But perhaps what we need is a tough economy. While we have been so blessed for so long (and while even this economic downturn is not yet disastrous), it is good to be reminded of our fortune. The love of money is the root of all evil, and America has lived through several generations that have adored money.
Having riches is a good thing, so long as they are earned and used wisely. But not everyone in America earns their money in the way they should. Some are given riches by the government, some by theft, and some from their rich old man. Moreover, not everyone is rightfully thankful and content for what they have; some beg the government, the banks, or their parents for more. Meanwhile, these people learn nothing about the value of work, honesty, and a free market.
With this said, I welcome any economic downturn with optimism, an optimism that when we wake up and grow up, we will turn it back around. Perhaps we need a few tough years – or decades – to wake consumers and spoiled kids up and let them realize what they have. Then we can put higher value in things like family, friendship, education, love, hobbies, God-given talents, church, etc., instead of material wealth. In short, we can be content with what we have, but not in what we have given. We cannot serve two masters. We can serve only God or money. And if the money is not readily available to us, it may leave us with just one choice. And if that is the case, then I welcome any economic woes with full heart.
What do you think?
God bless America
Pray for our Troops
January 27, 2009
Ryan Hampton
But perhaps what we need is a tough economy. While we have been so blessed for so long (and while even this economic downturn is not yet disastrous), it is good to be reminded of our fortune. The love of money is the root of all evil, and America has lived through several generations that have adored money.
Having riches is a good thing, so long as they are earned and used wisely. But not everyone in America earns their money in the way they should. Some are given riches by the government, some by theft, and some from their rich old man. Moreover, not everyone is rightfully thankful and content for what they have; some beg the government, the banks, or their parents for more. Meanwhile, these people learn nothing about the value of work, honesty, and a free market.
With this said, I welcome any economic downturn with optimism, an optimism that when we wake up and grow up, we will turn it back around. Perhaps we need a few tough years – or decades – to wake consumers and spoiled kids up and let them realize what they have. Then we can put higher value in things like family, friendship, education, love, hobbies, God-given talents, church, etc., instead of material wealth. In short, we can be content with what we have, but not in what we have given. We cannot serve two masters. We can serve only God or money. And if the money is not readily available to us, it may leave us with just one choice. And if that is the case, then I welcome any economic woes with full heart.
What do you think?
God bless America
Pray for our Troops
January 27, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Our Hope and Community: The Story of the Bible
What is the story of the Bible? Is it a book of virtues? Is it a book of nice fables? Is it a book of law? It may be a book of virtues, filled with many stories, but the story of the Bible is much deeper than this.
All of history is one story. That is how we must look at all of history. The Bible is a historical book that gives us the history of what has happened, and a foreshadowing of what is to come. All of history is one giant myth made fact. It captures the essence of human desire, emotion, and longing through God’s eternal sovereign plan.
When we look at the beauty of this eternal sovereign plan, we see great similarity in many stories, myths, and fables we hold today. These stories we love so much, such as the Chronicals of Narnia, Harry Potter, Cinderella, etc., are all loved by us because they give us a story of hope, meaning, purpose, love, etc. But all of these stories find their fulfillment in God’s story, as captured to us in the Bible.
In Scripture, we see a pattern of one overall theme, and many mini-versions of that throughout. This is called typology. For instance, we see the overall theme that Adam sinned, and Jesus is the second Adam who comes to save us from our inherited sin in Adam. Along the way, we see people who point us back to Adam, or perhaps point us ahead to Christ. Noah points us to Christ in that he begins the world anew, as Christ comes to make us new. Noah is like a new Adam, and a picture of what the ultimate new Adam will be like. Moses reminds of Noah by being saved through the “ark,” the basket, over water, and then points us ahead to a deliverer by saving his people from Pharoah. There is the theme in Scripture, of being saved by water, wood, bread, etc., which point us to being saved by the waters of baptism and the tree that Christ was nailed to, and at the Lord’s table. There are many women who point us to Eve, or the new Eve, the Church. All in all, Scripture is about a man who comes to save His Bride, but in order to do so He must die for her. This man, the new Adam, is also God, and this Bride, the new Eve, is made of men and women of all generations and races. Simply an amazing story, and yet it is one-hundred percent true!
With this in mind, let’s take a brief look at Scripture. Scripture begins with creation, and God giving us a pattern. He created the world in six days, and rested on the Seventh. He then gave the chief of His creation, Adam, a task. His task would image what God had done: he would subdue the earth, and rest every seventh day. God saw it was not good for man to be alone, so He created a community for Adam, imaging God Himself, Who is a community of three persons. Now there is a community between all persons of God, and Adam, Eve, and all future generations. The community is found primarily in the Garden of Eden, and man is to complete his task through the land of Eden and in the outer lands.
But man fell and broke community with God, and was thus kicked out of the Garden, the central place of community. God kicked man out of the Garden, but did not give up on man, promising a new Adam. For the next some four thousand years, God used prophets to prepare the way for this new Adam, ultimately culminating in John the Baptist preparing the way for Christ. God kept some community with His People by making covenant with certain men. The new Garden was the Tabernacle, you could say, but only certain people could go inside, and only at certain times. The community was now just for God’s chosen People, the Israelites. God would show Himself to certain people in voice or even appearance, but the overall community that was present in the Garden was broken.
When Christ came, He restored some of that community. We now have church to go to weekly, on the Sabbath, the Day of Rest. We have the communion of the Saints. We have Jesus Christ, the Scriptures, etc. And now this community is for all people who chose Christ, and the Church is not only for Priests, or “super-holy” people. The Church is the new Israel, but not just for one nation. Our corporate church worship is a new picture of Adam’s community in the Garden of Eden with God.
There are those who have died, and have gone to Heaven. There is community there as well. And as we worship God in corporate worship, we worship with all Saints, and with all the company of Heaven. We get to take part in a meal, the Lord’s Supper, in which we eat with Christ. We have much more Christian community with God then we realize. This is why going to church is important. It is where we keep covenant with God, share in His blessings, eat the daily bread He gives us, give our tithes and offerings to Him, etc. It is where we weekly renew covenant with God. This is where God first and foremost makes Himself known to us, so that we may go out and complete our tasks the rest of the week in our day-to-day lives.
Still, this is not the final goal. Nor is Heaven even the final goal. We still have our sinful nature. Heaven and earth may come together weekly. But even yet, there is still something missing. Although we come into Heaven’s presence, we do not see God, the angels, or the souls of those who have gone into Heaven. Heaven and earth are still two separate things. We have great community, but this, nor even Heaven, is our final hope.
Our final hope is in Final Resurrection glory. Heaven and earth will be one. Jesus will be King. There will not be a disconnect between our bodies and souls. We will have one good nature, and not our sinful nature. As many people in the Old Covenant prepared the way for Christ, so now we must prepare the way for the Final Resurrection. We do this by obeying the Great Commission, taking part in the community God has given us (which is the church), and preaching the Good News to all, baptizing them in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. One day our community with God will be completely restored, and it will be even better than before the Fall. And we will have all of this forever!
But the first and foremost way to wait upon this final glory and community is to be thankful and partake in the glory and community we have now in Christ. Going to church is not something we do to win brownie points with God. It is where God makes Himself known. And if we forsake the assembly of the Saints now, then how do we expect God to let us into final glory? We must appreciate the story of the Bible more. Appreciate that we are God’s chosen People Who have been saved because our Groom, the Son of God Himself, died the death that the worst of sinners die. The Bible begins with the marriage of Adam and Eve, and ends with the marriage of Christ and His Bride. This story should fill our hearts and minds with wonder, and cause us to look ahead, and prepare the way for Christ’s second coming.
What do you think?
God bless America
God bless His Church
January 8, 2009
Ryan Hampton
All of history is one story. That is how we must look at all of history. The Bible is a historical book that gives us the history of what has happened, and a foreshadowing of what is to come. All of history is one giant myth made fact. It captures the essence of human desire, emotion, and longing through God’s eternal sovereign plan.
When we look at the beauty of this eternal sovereign plan, we see great similarity in many stories, myths, and fables we hold today. These stories we love so much, such as the Chronicals of Narnia, Harry Potter, Cinderella, etc., are all loved by us because they give us a story of hope, meaning, purpose, love, etc. But all of these stories find their fulfillment in God’s story, as captured to us in the Bible.
In Scripture, we see a pattern of one overall theme, and many mini-versions of that throughout. This is called typology. For instance, we see the overall theme that Adam sinned, and Jesus is the second Adam who comes to save us from our inherited sin in Adam. Along the way, we see people who point us back to Adam, or perhaps point us ahead to Christ. Noah points us to Christ in that he begins the world anew, as Christ comes to make us new. Noah is like a new Adam, and a picture of what the ultimate new Adam will be like. Moses reminds of Noah by being saved through the “ark,” the basket, over water, and then points us ahead to a deliverer by saving his people from Pharoah. There is the theme in Scripture, of being saved by water, wood, bread, etc., which point us to being saved by the waters of baptism and the tree that Christ was nailed to, and at the Lord’s table. There are many women who point us to Eve, or the new Eve, the Church. All in all, Scripture is about a man who comes to save His Bride, but in order to do so He must die for her. This man, the new Adam, is also God, and this Bride, the new Eve, is made of men and women of all generations and races. Simply an amazing story, and yet it is one-hundred percent true!
With this in mind, let’s take a brief look at Scripture. Scripture begins with creation, and God giving us a pattern. He created the world in six days, and rested on the Seventh. He then gave the chief of His creation, Adam, a task. His task would image what God had done: he would subdue the earth, and rest every seventh day. God saw it was not good for man to be alone, so He created a community for Adam, imaging God Himself, Who is a community of three persons. Now there is a community between all persons of God, and Adam, Eve, and all future generations. The community is found primarily in the Garden of Eden, and man is to complete his task through the land of Eden and in the outer lands.
But man fell and broke community with God, and was thus kicked out of the Garden, the central place of community. God kicked man out of the Garden, but did not give up on man, promising a new Adam. For the next some four thousand years, God used prophets to prepare the way for this new Adam, ultimately culminating in John the Baptist preparing the way for Christ. God kept some community with His People by making covenant with certain men. The new Garden was the Tabernacle, you could say, but only certain people could go inside, and only at certain times. The community was now just for God’s chosen People, the Israelites. God would show Himself to certain people in voice or even appearance, but the overall community that was present in the Garden was broken.
When Christ came, He restored some of that community. We now have church to go to weekly, on the Sabbath, the Day of Rest. We have the communion of the Saints. We have Jesus Christ, the Scriptures, etc. And now this community is for all people who chose Christ, and the Church is not only for Priests, or “super-holy” people. The Church is the new Israel, but not just for one nation. Our corporate church worship is a new picture of Adam’s community in the Garden of Eden with God.
There are those who have died, and have gone to Heaven. There is community there as well. And as we worship God in corporate worship, we worship with all Saints, and with all the company of Heaven. We get to take part in a meal, the Lord’s Supper, in which we eat with Christ. We have much more Christian community with God then we realize. This is why going to church is important. It is where we keep covenant with God, share in His blessings, eat the daily bread He gives us, give our tithes and offerings to Him, etc. It is where we weekly renew covenant with God. This is where God first and foremost makes Himself known to us, so that we may go out and complete our tasks the rest of the week in our day-to-day lives.
Still, this is not the final goal. Nor is Heaven even the final goal. We still have our sinful nature. Heaven and earth may come together weekly. But even yet, there is still something missing. Although we come into Heaven’s presence, we do not see God, the angels, or the souls of those who have gone into Heaven. Heaven and earth are still two separate things. We have great community, but this, nor even Heaven, is our final hope.
Our final hope is in Final Resurrection glory. Heaven and earth will be one. Jesus will be King. There will not be a disconnect between our bodies and souls. We will have one good nature, and not our sinful nature. As many people in the Old Covenant prepared the way for Christ, so now we must prepare the way for the Final Resurrection. We do this by obeying the Great Commission, taking part in the community God has given us (which is the church), and preaching the Good News to all, baptizing them in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. One day our community with God will be completely restored, and it will be even better than before the Fall. And we will have all of this forever!
But the first and foremost way to wait upon this final glory and community is to be thankful and partake in the glory and community we have now in Christ. Going to church is not something we do to win brownie points with God. It is where God makes Himself known. And if we forsake the assembly of the Saints now, then how do we expect God to let us into final glory? We must appreciate the story of the Bible more. Appreciate that we are God’s chosen People Who have been saved because our Groom, the Son of God Himself, died the death that the worst of sinners die. The Bible begins with the marriage of Adam and Eve, and ends with the marriage of Christ and His Bride. This story should fill our hearts and minds with wonder, and cause us to look ahead, and prepare the way for Christ’s second coming.
What do you think?
God bless America
God bless His Church
January 8, 2009
Ryan Hampton
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
